The Evolution of Daniel Craig’s Suit Fit in the James Bond Films


Daniel Craig is famous for the tight-fitting suits he wore as James Bond, but his fits weren’t always that way. Changes in fashion, changes in suitmakers and changes in costume designers brought variation in the ways that Craig’s suits fit throughout his tenure as Bond. The fits define the suit styles that Daniel Craig wears more than any other aspect of the silhouettes.

Casino Royale (2006)

When Daniel Craig began his tenure as James Bond, he inherited both the costume design, Lindy Hemming, and suitmaker, Brioni, who worked on Pierce Brosnan’s four Bond films. Brioni made four suits plus a dinner suit for Casino Royale.

The jackets are made in different styles—three buttons on the suits, one suit with peaked lapels, and a dinner jacket with one button and peaked lapels—but they all have the same fit based on the ‘Chigi’ model. The silhouette comes from the Roman tradition, with straight, padded shoulders and roped sleeve heads. The shoulders are exceptionally wide so they can match the width of Daniel Craig’s muscular build and allow the sleeves to drape cleanly from the shoulders.

Unlike the fuller fits that Brioni made for Brosnan, Craig’s jackets fit closely through the body with significant waist suppression, but they have a clean fit. The intent behind this fit is to is to have an elegant drape that also emphasises Craig’s athletic physique. Craig is at his most muscular in this film, and the jackets work with it. The jackets also have a traditional length that fully covers the seat. The sleeves were often too long, which makes the jackets look a little sloppy even if they otherwise aren’t.

The suit trousers all have a darted front, a high rise and a wide leg hemmed with a full break. The dinner suit trousers change up the style with single reverse pleats. Some of the suit trousers sit lower than they’re designed to because the belt doesn’t hold them up well.

The leg width is the most notable fashion of these trousers. Wide legs were fashionable in 2006, after being fashionable in various forms since the 1970s. These legs are some of the most shapeless of the Bond series, with only a little taper. The wide legs attempt to balance Daniel Craig’s bulk on top for a more elegant look. Whether or not this elegance is achieved is a matter of taste.

The fit of the suits in Casino Royale has the goal to make Daniel Craig look both elegant and imposing, but muscular bodies prove to be some of the most difficult to tailor in an elegant way. It’s one reason why the skimpy La Perla swim trunks made the biggest splash of all of Craig’s looks in the film. While some costume choices in the film reflect Bond as a new 00 agent, his suit fit isn’t intended to reflect immaturity in character or in fashion sense. He’s meant to look perfect in his tailored clothes, even if the fashions don’t all hold up many years later.

The fit in Casino Royale is based on timeless principles, and one day this style will look fashionable again. The aughts, however, lacked any defined trends in tailoring. Men were asked if they wanted a jacket with two buttons or three buttons and trousers with pleats or a flat front. Regional silhouettes dominated because there was no popular fashion to unify them like there would be in the 2010s. Fits were about neatness, with no specific expectations for fullness or tightness.

Quantum of Solace (2008)

James Bond was first introduced to Tom Ford suits in Quantum of Solace, and the character would enjoy a relationship with the brand through the rest of Daniel Craig’s tenure. The menswear brand had launched only two years earlier in 2006. The film also had a new costume designer, Louise Frogley. Together they reinvented James Bond’ a completely new ‘s silhouette.

Daniel Craig had lost some of his bulk from Casino Royale and his new suits were based on a size EU50. Craig’s trimmer physique allowed for the suits to also be trimmer, but Tom Ford’s aesthetic derived from English bespoke tailoring was inherently trimmer than Brioni’s wider Roman style. Ford also prefers his suits to have a very close fit, but not necessarily an overly tight or shrunken fit. The suits in Quantum of Solace follow Ford’s fit preference, which has remained the same since even though his suits in subsequent Bond films are tighter and shorter. The shrunken look was still a fringe fashion in 2008 and it wouldn’t be adopted by Bond until the following film in the following decade, but the trim fit of this suit reflects some of the influence of the tighter suits worn on the runways.

Craig wears the ‘Regency’ model, also known as ‘Base B’. It has a dramatic look, with wide pagoda shoulders. The shoulders are not as built up as the Brioni shoulders, so they look more natural on Craig while still being wide enough to match his strong build.

The jacket’s fit looks slightly too snug on Craig at times, but for the most part it is smoothly fitted over the body. The jackets have a traditional length that fully covers the seat, bringing a classic elegance to the silhouette.

The trousers have a mid rise and a trim leg with a contoured shape. The legs are somewhat narrow, but they aren’t tight. The jacket and trousers combine into a balanced silhouette that’s mainly elegant but with a hint of aggression. This aspect of Tom Ford’s look works for Daniel Craig’s iteration of 007.

Skyfall (2012)

Skyfall saw a revolution in James Bond’s style with costume designer Jany Temime, and the new fit of his Tom Ford suits was one of the most significant evolutions in Craig’s Bond’s style. It was all about the new ‘slim fit’ fashion that Temime wanted to incorporate for an ‘iconic for 2012’ look.

The term ‘slim fit’ had taken on a new meaning at this time. What was previously a term that described a trimmer ready-to-wear fit that could more readily accommodate a slim person in contrast to a less shaped ‘classic’ or ‘traditional’ fit had morphed into a fashion trend that indicated a suit that was too small for the person wearing it. While Hedi Slimane at Dior Homme initiated this fashion in 2005, it took more than a few years for this look to become mainstream. In 2012 it was still a shocking look for James Bond, especially since it wasn’t a look professionals had yet adopted, but after Skyfall that changed. It transitioned from a nightclub fashion to an office look thanks to James Bond.

While Daniel Craig was roughly the same size in Skyfall that he was in Quantum of Solace, his new suits in the ‘O’Connor’ model with a ‘Base F’ fit were a size EU48. This small sizer combined with a new cut gave Craig a fresh look for Skyfall. While the new look was very fashion-forward on James Bond, it didn’t go to the extremes that Dior Homme or Thom Browne did in tightness or shortness.

The shoulders are much narrower than they were in the previous two films. Narrow shoulders give the jacket a more natural look, but they also downplay Craig’s muscular physique and don’t allow the sleeves to drape as neatly over the upper arms. The sleeves are also narrower in an attempt to show off Craig’s muscles, but they lack the drape and movement from before.

While the jacket has a close fit through the body in Quantum of Solace, in Skyfall the fit is too tight for it to follow the shape of Craig’s body, with considerable pulling as it fights the body. The jacket’s length is noticeably shorter, exposing the bottom of the buttocks.

The trousers have a similar silhouette to the one from Quantum of Solace, but they’ve been slimmed down for Skyfall.

Because the suit is so tight, it doesn’t move well with the body and it looks best in certain poses. The tight fit also doesn’t allow for fluctuations in body size, so it may fit better in some scenes than it does in others. While Daniel Craig’s training works to get his body to a specific size, there’s naturally going to be fluctuations in his body throughout a film production that takes many months. Such a tight fit works better on a rigid sculpture that it does on a living, breathing and moving body.

While the aggressive fit mirrors Craig’s portrayal of Bond, it is mainly a reflection of Daniel Craig’s fondness of the era’s tight fashions. After Skyfall the style would bring the tight look from the runway to mainstream fashion, with almost every suit brand updating their silhouette. Tom Ford was one of the few fashion brands that continued to offer a more traditional style that stayed true to their history, despite what they popularised in Skyfall.

Spectre (2015)

Tom Ford and Jany Temime returned for Spectre, and the overall look from Skyfall continued with minor tweaks to suit Craig’s slightly trimmer physique. Fashions hadn’t changed, and Craig’s personal preferences remained the same.

The most significant change is that the shoulders are wider in Spectre. This may be because the jacket has wider shoulders or because Craig’s own upper body has less bulk than it did in Skyfall. Either way, the shoulder fit is an improvement. The body, however, sometimes appears tighter than it did in Skyfall. The trousers also look tighter this time with a lower rise.

For one suit and an ivory dinner jacket, Spectre introduced Bond to Tom Ford’s classic ‘Windsor’ model with wide peaked lapels and two buttons instead of Craig’s usual three buttons. While this model typically comes with a fuller fit, Craig’s examples have the same tight fit as his O’Connor suits.

Spectre also has Daniel Craig wearing one ready-to-wear tailored jacket from Brunello Cucinelli. Like the Tom Ford suits it has a short and very close fit, but the body of the jacket better follows the shape of Daniel Craig’s body. The shoulders have a very narrow fit, which is too narrow for Craig’s athletic build. Even though Craig is trimmer in Spectre, his shoulders are still too big for this jacket, and his arms are bulging out of the sleeves.

No Time to Die (2021, filmed 2019)

Tom Ford returned for their fourth time suiting James Bond in No Time to Die, but there was a new costume designer: Suttirat Anne Larlarb. Larlarb made minor changes to the O’Connor silhouette that Craig wore in the previous two films, but overall the same style makes a reprise.

Though No Time to Die was released in 2021, it was made in 2019, so the fashions should be considered as being of the 2010s rather than the 2020s. The tight suit was still in fashion, and it was still Craig’s preference. The fit, however, is less aggressive in this film, and the suits drape more naturally over Craig without straining. Unlike in the last two films, he no longer looks like he’s wearing a size too small. It shows more maturity that effectively shows a James Bond who is ready for his final mission.

However, the fit has one glaring issue: the jackets’ collars do not sit against the neck and show a gap between the shirt collar. This issue isn’t related to any fashions; it’s simply a poor fit. The mark of a good fit, whether it’s tight or full, is that the collar should hug the neck without any ripples in the upper back below the collar. This issue happens when the jacket is designed for a different posture or when the upper back is too tight. It can be fixed by removing the collar and shortening it.

No Time to Die also features one ready-to-wear suit from Massimo Alba, whose needlecord suit has a different style and silhouette than the Tom Ford suits, most notably due to its soft shoulders, but the fit is generally the same as the Tom Ford suits in the film albeit less refined. It also has the same the collar gap problem.

While many people today still like a very tight suit, the fashion has run its course as its shock value has dissipated over a decade later. Extremes in fashion never last forever, particularly as people look for the next extreme. Craig’s tenure as James Bond showed an evolution from big shoulders and wide trousers to narrow shoulders and tight trousers just six years later, only to back away from the tightness seven years later. The fashion pendulum always swings back and forth, passing through a point of balance along the way. Now that four years have passed since No Time to Die was filmed, the pendulum has continued to slowly swing back to its equilibrium from Skyfall, but it hasn’t figured out its new direction yet that will define the tailored style of the 2020s, if there will even be one.


  1. The Skyfall fit is one of the elements that spoils an otherwise good film (Javier Bardem’s dyed hair the other) – I get vicariously uncomfortable when I see someone in an obviously too-tight suit.

    QoS’s fit will stand the test of time.

    I wonder about the impact of injury on the fit in Spectre – wasn’t Craig injured in the making? He did look a little less trim around the middle in some shots (e.g. in the Cucinelli jacket after they get off the train).

    • Yes, the Skyfall fit is one of the elements that really spoils an otherwise rather good film. The QoS fit is the element that somewhat saves an otherwise totally useless film.
      QoS’s fit will stand the test of time.

      • I’ve always been a bit bemused by the vehemence with which so many people seem to dislike QOS. I thought that given the challenges it was one of the better of the Craig era. I also seem to remember Craig said that compared to getting in shape for CR, training for QOS was so much more difficult. As the series wore on we saw less and less shirtless Craig as getting cut was no doubt more challenging with advancing age. Maybe that’s why the suits got tighter, perhaps he was know saying for his physique by wearing tight suits to show his bulging legs and triceps.

      • Not sure I’d agree QoS an otherwise useless film. It has its shortcomings, but it doesn’t dither, has a credible plot (by Bond standards), carried on the realistic fighting of CR (sadly abandoned thereafter), has some great sequences and is probably Craig’s best acting in the role.

      • I also like QoS plot, there are just some awkward situations. And maybe just a lack of coordinating the scenes and/or putting them together. I don’t like how they finished Matis, they shouldn’t have done it at all. But QoS is very grounded. Reminded me of the Connery era. It touches on a very current theme, corruption, Three letter agencies playing God, etc. When Bond gets to confront henchmen is not in arcadish, God mode or at least there are not dozens and dozens of bad guys with horrible aim. Pretty underrated film. Maybe a better main song would have helped too.

  2. My capsule review of the fits:

    CR – pretty good
    QOS – good but overrated
    Skyfall – bad
    SPECTRE – bad
    NTTD – bad

  3. I’d like to see a much less fashionable Bond in the next film. For me, the smattering of workwear in the last film was even more unwelcome than the poorly fitted suits.

    Other than Roger Moore, no actor to play Bond before Craig had nearly as much impact on what Bond wore onscreen. And, although I like Moore’s style (particularly relative to Craig’s), it’s no coincidence that the Craig and Moore tenures are the most controversial in terms of Bond’s clothing. Understated elegance should be the hallmark of Bond’s attire. By the end, Craig just resembled an old man desperately trying to look hip.

    • As much as the ‘dated’ fashions of Dalton’s era are perennially decried I’d consider reevaluation, if not of their quality then their potential intent – Dalton’s Bond liked suits, but he was possibly the farthest iteration of Bond from a ‘dandy’ that was ever put to celluloid. Dalton’s Bond liked dark suits that didn’t stand out beyond their emphasis of the man himself; moreover he seemed like a man prepared to compromise with ‘off the rack’ suits rather than meticulously tailored garments.

      Also, his navy Harrington jacket was a superb choice, as was his quartz Heuer watch. ‘Elegant’ doesn’t have to mean ‘the literal best’ and Dalton’s Bond seemed like a man who’d pursue ‘good’ without going overboard.

  4. So, average, to very good, to “oh my God that’s going to Lucifer’s office”, then dow hill, and then to nothingness.

    Janine Temime should have been fired right at the parking lot.

  5. I really appreciate this article, but the part on the fit of the pants is very definitive. I do like how clean the fit of his pants/trousers and in general of his suits is in Quantum of Solace. The trousers look so clean, no strange shapes, good drape. I have looked for that. Is trim but not skinny, those were the key words. Thanks for this. Keep up the good work.

    • This trouser shape is not easy to find. It’s a contoured straight leg that follows the shape of the leg. Apart from Tom Ford, I have bespoke trousers from Anthony Sinclair with this shape as well as a pair of made-to-measure trousers on the way that have the same shape.

  6. Somewhat off topic but still Craig-era; Matt, will you be writing about M’s wardrobe in No Time to Die? Some nice suits, though M sometimes has his jacket off in the office!

    • I’ve considered writing about the suits in No Time to Die, but they don’t stand out to me as much as his suits in the previous films. I’ll have to give them another look.

  7. Rod: interesting reflections about the tight fit of Craigs suits as a substitute for going shirtless IRT challenging with advancing age. The main issue with QOS is that it lacks a script due to the scriptwriters going on strike but the producers decided to go ahead with the film anyway. Hence the lackluster result. Ironically, it is the Bondfilm where Craig looks his best, so at least it has something going for it.

  8. I was shocked to see what my nephew was wearing a few weeks ago. He’s a young man, still in school, and very much in-tune with fashion. My image of him was still what he was wearing a decade ago; extremely skinny purple lightweight jeans. Over Easter he turned up to lunch wearing extremely heavy, stonewashed jeans with a wide-leg. And I mean really wide leg. He might have been able to climb into one of the pant legs and hop around!
    My first thought was “Finally, the skinny fit trend is officially a thing of the past. Rejoice, all ye lovers of drape!”
    Then “… maybe I should be careful what I wish for.”
    Time will tell if this is the defining look of the ’20s.

    • I’ve noticed young people and a few celebrities dressing this way as well. As with most trends, it started with women’s fashion and now seems to be moving over to menswear. It certainly strikes me as a reaction to the skinny trend that dominated the past decade or so. It might look even worse, though.

  9. Tight fits had been already very popular around 2012 (especially in Europe and in NYC), so it was hardly the film Skyfall that made the slim fit fashionable.
    Wide fits are definitely back with even mainstream brands like J. Crew selling wide pleated trousers. Many men are still hesitant to wear wider fits as they’re so used to wearing tight clothes, but eventually they will have to give up. Overall I find the current trends to be quite an improvement compared to the trends that dominated the past decade.

      • And don’t forget how popular they were on the runways about six years before that, popularized by Gucci and the likes. And comes with it, this alternative heroin-chic, emo, skinny style that disgusted me to no end.

  10. Who makes pagoda shoulders besides bespoke these days? I know it was always a rare bird but to my knowledge, I’ve never encountered it in real life. The look on the shoulders is outstanding.

    • I think the Kingsman shill stuffs are slightly pagoda-esque. Some fashion brands also make them, but they look atrocious. I vaguely recall an Italian bespoke house has some RTW with pagoda-esque shoulders. Miller’s Oath also have some of them on RTW line.

      • I think pagoda shoulders is one of those things that need to be done well. Subtly, I mean. Many moons ago I asked a (very cheap) tailor to handsew the buttonholes on my lapels, and they came out looking like the shop had been invaded by a roving band of hostile anthropomorphic sewing needles.
        Alright, that’s an exaggeration, but they really weren’t good. Pagoda shoulders, I’m guessing, would be exceptionally difficult to make, and a bad example might have one looking like some insensitive eastern stereotype.
        But should anyone find a tailor who’ll do them, please let me know.

      • So, one of the worst examples of pagoda shoulder was actually circulated on StyleForum, coming from Napoli Su Misura, and was ridiculed as the “pa-f@$&ed shoulder”. Getting it right is not hard (relatively for a good tailor), but it does require absurd amount of attention as it was crafted. So, two exemplary examples of those who make good ones include Chris Despos and Jeffrey Diduch. So far, only Chris Despos is one I know actively making it. Diduch has been working for a factory for a good long while now, and hasn’t been involved in bespoke tailoring for a while.

  11. IMHO, the only reasonable ‘pagoda’ leaning shoulder style is the Cifonelli interpretation and I personally do not care for it as it looks too structured, almost military. Edward Sexton also can tend to look ‘pagoda-ish’ in some of his styles which I still find a bit too ‘avant-garde’ . The rest is best relegated to women’s fashion or the sci-fi genre. To me, the Craig era started off well sartorially with CR and then lost it’s way perhaps because of various ‘younger’ wardrobe people and excess product placement(and sponsors) and actor’s personal inputs with the mongrel finale in NTTD( thank god it’s all dead!) You would need a reincarnation of a Terence Young and an Anthony Sinclair to restore real style and elegance to our fictional hero in our world of social disharmony and ugliness .

    • The interesting thing about many pagoda shoulders, including Cifonelli’s, is that while they look strong they aren’t overly structured. They emphasise the concave part of the shoulder. It’s not like a British military shoulder that is more built up throughout.

  12. I’m not sure that evolution is the correct word to describe the ever decreasing quality of fit in the Craig films


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.