Should Collar Points Reach Your Lapels?


Here’s a topic that comes up occasionally, and some people have strong opinions about it while others can’t be bothered with it. Some believe that a shirt’s collar points must be hidden under the jacket’s lapels. Others accept that certain narrower collar designs will not be hidden under the lapels. I prefer the neatness of collar points that reach the lapels, but it’s ultimately a matter of taste if your collar points reach the fold of your lapels or not.

The points of Sean Connery’s spread collar in From Russia with Love just meet the lapels.

A spread, semi-spread or cutaway collar should always be designed in a way that ensures the collar points will be anchored against or tucked just under the jacket’s lapels. The body of the shirt should not show between the collar and the lapels. If the points of a spread, semi-spread or cutaway collar aren’t long enough to reach the lapels, they are too short and are likely to float away from the chest. Points that are too long will prevent the lapels from sitting flat on the chest.

The points of Daniel Craig’s point collar in Spectre do not reach the lapels. Most point collars do not.

Point collars, and related narrow collars like tab collars, pin collars and button-down collars, may or may not sit under the lapels because of their narrower spread angle between the points. The average point collar is designed to show the tips of the collar points. However, point collars with long points and/or a large tie space may have points that reach the lapels, if the jacket opening is small enough or if a waistcoat is worn. This is the case for all of George Lazenby’s and Roger Moore’s point collars. Such point collars have a neater look.

Roger Moore’s point collar fits neatly into the small opening of his double-breasted dinner jacket in The Spy Who Loved Me.

A smaller jacket opening, such as on a button-three jacket or a double-breasted jacket, means that the collar points can be shorter or spaced narrower than with a larger jacket opening so the collar points will meet the lapels. Likewise, a waistcoat creates a smaller opening for shorter collar points. Points that sit under a waistcoat will prevent the waistcoat from sitting flat on the body. Points that sit on top of a waistcoat look sloppy. With wider collar spreads, the point length needed to fill a deep jacket opening and to fill a high jacket opening or waistcoat opening becomes negligible.

George Lazenby’s point collar fits neatly into the small opening of his waistcoat in On Her Majesty’s Secret Service.

This concept isn’t only applicable when the collar is worn fastened with a tie. Even when unbuttoned, the collar points need to be long enough that they don’t float away from the body if the collar isn’t a button-down collar. With a non-button-down collar, the collar points will rest against the fold of the jacket’s lapels, and the length is important to help them stay in place. The ideal point length can be determined by fastening the collar and seeing if the points reach the lapels, but this isn’t quite as important, and it may be irrelevant with a narrower collar.

The points of Pierce Brosnan’s open point collar in The World Is Not Enough sit neatly against the opening of his jacket.

Roger Moore’s shirtmaker Frank Foster considers the length of the collar points as they relate to the size of the jacket opening. This is easy to see in The Man with the Golden Gun, where the semi-spread collars have longer points with button-two single-breasted jackets to fill the larger opening and shorter points with double-breasted jackets to fill the smaller opening. There is fairly large difference in the length of the points: they are approximately 3 3/8 inches with single-breasted jackets and about 3 inches with double-breasted jackets. We don’t notice the difference because the shirt collars always fit perfectly with the jackets.

The points of Roger Moore’s semi-spread collar in The Man with the Golden Gun are longer with single-breasted jackets.

In real life, nobody needs to dress with this level of precision. That’s for costume designers to worry about. Dressing well is just as much art as it is science. This is merely a tool that can help us dress better, but we’d go mad if we were a slave to it.

The points of Roger Moore’s semi-spread collar in The Man with the Golden Gun are shorter with double-breasted jackets.

Collar point length doesn’t only depend how it fits within the jacket’s opening. It should also be determined based on the height and spread of the collar, face and head size, neck length, overall body height, lapel width and gorge position. Dressing each person with their ideal collar design is an art and a matter of taste, not a mathematical calculation.


  1. It’s really hard to get this right off-the-rack. I’m fairly average-sized, no unusually large or small neck, shoulders, or height, but pretty much every non-point collar I have doesn’t meet the lapels. Some of my shirts have some sort of fashionably(?) short cutaway collar, most have a semi-spread, and there’s almost always a centimetre wide between the jacket and the shirt. It drives me nuts.

    I really like a nice spread collar that disappears into the jacket, but lately, I’ve taken to wearing point collars, because with them, the gap looks purposeful, not sloppy…

  2. Thanks for a highly interesting article.

    I really like Sean’s, George’s and Roger’s collar points.

    In pic #6, Bond looks like the Saint, with that ventilation shaft as a halo over his head!

  3. Wow! This is something I had never, ever thought about but will now consider. In terms of whether the collar points need to reach the lapel, having read your article, I say yes. Roger, as usual, gets it right. But if a collar that’s the right size to meet the lapel of a waistcoat is smaller than a collar that meets the lapel of a jacket, does this mean I need a different collar for three and two piece suits?

  4. I think the point of a shirt collar is to attract attention to the face. If the points do not meet the jacket lapels it might have the opposite effect as it sometimes does for Daniel Craig. I have been lucky enough that my MTM supplier have jackets, shirts and waistcoats that are fairly well-coordinated in this regard, but it is a valid point with the points under the waistcoat. But as long as it is not extreme and the waistcoat is still flush against the collar I believe it is still looks good. In short I believe it is possible to strike a versatile middle ground as per your not going insane observation.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.