Navy in New York: The Chesterfield Coat and Suit in Live and Let Die

31

Original article published 23 December 2010

I am in the process of rewriting and republishing old articles about James Bond’s outfits that are in need of a refresh and expansion. All former comments are preserved below. I previously wrote very little about this overcoat because the late Christopher Laverty thoroughly covered it on his blog, Clothes on Film. Now I would like to take the opportunity to provide my take on it in honour of what would have been Roger Moore’s 98th birthday this week. This outfit has a special meaning to me, as I live and work in the same neighbourhoods where Bond wears this outfit.

James Bond’s navy double-breasted chesterfield coat in Live and Let Die is Roger Moore’s only overcoat of the James Bond series. It is one of the most popular coats of the Bond series, not just for being a beautiful piece of tailoring but for how it establishes Moore as James Bond. This coat is Moore’s first proper item of clothing as Bond, after his introduction wearing a dressing gown with matching pyjamas.

This outfit helps ease Moore into the role of 007, without being too fashion forward. It has left the 1960s proportions behind, but like what Bond wore in the 1960s, the outfit doesn’t lean heavily into trends. It follows a familiar colour palette that focuses on shades of blue. The navy double-breasted overcoat references Bond’s naval heritage without it being a military-style coat. It’s not as obvious as the tie is about Bond serving in the Royal Navy, but it looks appropriate for a naval officer out of uniform. Sean Connery briefly wears a navy chesterfield coat as part of his first outfit as Bond in Dr. No, but his is single-breasted. The double-breasted style is far more striking and more naval.

The coat, made by Moore’s longtime tailor before the Bond films Cyril A. Castle, makes a statement without being loud. It’s a classic double-breasted chesterfield coat, albeit in a shorter-than-traditional length that’s just about the knee. The coat is a flattering length that balances the coat’s length and Moore’s leg length to make them both look as long as possible. In closer shots the bottom of the coat is off-screen and looks long, while in further shots Moore’s legs appear very long. Cyril Castle’s brother Claude Castle was the head cutter at the firm and likely cut this coat. The coat is tailored with lightly padded shoulders and has a dramatic shape with a full chest and fitted waist, despite no front darts. It was tailored with a considerable amount of iron work to achieve such a three-dimensional shape.

It appears to be made of cashmere or a wool-cashmere blend due to its sheen and lighter weight. Cashmere is lighter and more insulating than wool, making it a practical fibre in addition to its pleasingly soft hand. Cyril Castle was not averse to using luxury fibres.

The coat has a traditional and formal 6×2 double-breasted fastening. The middle buttons are low on the waist to create a sweeping lapel line, emphasising the coat’s wide, bellied lapels. While the wide lapels are a reflection of 1970s trends, they give the coat more of a 1930s look due to the coat’s overall traditional style. The wide lapels look bold but not outdated, and while they help the coat fit in with contemporary fashions the coat is the opposite of fashion forward.

The coat’s traditional style is unusual for Roger Moore’s Bond in the 1970s, a time when Bond was known to lean more heavily into fashions. It’s a fitting coat for his ‘disguise’, as CIA Agent Harold Strutter calls it—’whiteface in Harlem’. No matter how fashionable Bond may look to post-1970s eyes, he is dressed conservatively compared to most of the villains in Live and Let Die. This coat especially has very little to tie it to 1970s fashions, and its an especially conservative piece for Cyril Castle, who was located physically in Mayfair’s Conduit Street but with his heart in Soho’s Carnaby Street.

The coat is trimmed with large (probably 45L) dark navy polyester buttons, with one large button (probably 30L) on each cuff. The sleeves are finished with turnback cuffs, a traditional detail found on various types of overcoats, notably the greatcoat and polo coat. These gauntlet cuffs are done in a style more typically found on jackets than overcoats. Cyril Castle commonly put gauntlet cuffs on all kinds of coats and jackets, including many of Moore’s dinner jackets, suit jackets, blazers and sports coats in The Saint and The Persuaders!. Moore’s only other garment to feature them in the Bond films is his dinner jacket in The Man with the Golden Gun.

The coat is detailed with a dark navy velvet collar, a traditional feature commonly found on a chesterfield as well as on the sportier covert coat. The hip pockets are straight with wide flaps, and the coat lacks a breast pocket. Only the left lapel has a buttonhole. There is a long single vent at the rear. The lining is navy.

Two examples of this overcoat have sold at auction. The first one sold at Christie’s in South Kensington on 12 Dec 2001 for £1,762, and this is the same coat that is featured in the blog at Clothes on Film. The wrong coat is pictured on the Christie’s website, but the photos of the coat at Clothes on Film show the correct coat. The second coat sold at Bonhams in New Bond Street on 4 October 2023 for £19,200. This was part of an auction titled ‘Sir Roger Moore: The Personal Collection’, and the coat came from Roger Moore’s own wardrobe.


Photo sourced from Thunderballs.org

Underneath the chesterfield, Bond wears a light navy worsted flannel suit, also made by Cyril Castle. The suit is a shade lighter than the overcoat, in a vivid shade of navy sometimes called French navy. The cloth is worsted flannel, a milled worsted that has some of the look, feel and warmth of a traditional woollen flannel but in concurrently sturdier and lighter-weight cloth that has a slightly less old-fashioned look. This cloth appears to be in a traditional medium weight of around 13 ounces, which is fairly heavy by today’s standards. The suit coat isn’t seen much in the film, but the double vents can be seen when Roger Moore is swinging around on the fire escape in the Harlem alley. However, Roger Moore wears this suit in many promotional stills as well as in the opening gun barrel sequence, which was also used for The Man with the Golden Gun.

The suit is cut the same as the tropical suits in light grey and beige that Bond wears in San Monique. The suit jacket is tailored in Castle’s dramatic English style, with two buttons in a medium-low stance, a swelled chest and a suppressed waist. The shoulders are lightly structured with natural sleeve heads. The lapels appear to be around 3 1/2 inches wide, so they’re in the medium-width range. The front has slightly open lower quarters with a pronounced roundness at the bottom.

This is the only suit or jacket that Moore’s Bond wears from Cyril Castle that has straight pockets, which gives this suit a more business-like look. Slanted hacking pockets were Cyril Castle’s preferred style from the mid-1960s onward, which he put on most of Moore’s jackets during this time. The skirt has long double vents and the cuffs are flared with kissing ‘link’ buttons, with back-to-back size-27L buttons. The buttons are made of navy polyester to match the suit. Polyester buttons were commonly used by the best English tailors at this time for their smart, plain look and vast colour selection and were not a means of cost cutting, which they would be today in place of natural materials like horn or corozo.

Like the chesterfield, the suit jacket has a classic English style overall with hardly any detail that dates it to the 1970s. The link-button cuffs are the only unusual detail on the jacket, but they’re not a style widely associated with the decade.

The suit trousers have a darted front with three-button side adjusters, two rear pockets, two cash pockets in front under the waistband, no side pockets and slightly flared bootcut legs. The flared legs are the only aspect of this outfit that dates it to the early 1970s. The flared trousers and the link-button cuffs are the only fashion-forward elements on this otherwise classic and conservative business suit. It’s the kind of suit Bond would wear to M’s office, if Live and Let Die had an M’s office scene.

The shirt, made by Roger Moore’s longtime shirtmaker Frank Foster, is a fresh take on the light blue cocktail-cuff shirts that Sean Connery commonly wore as Bond, and it’s the one part of this outfit that has the most in common with Connery’s Bond style. It is sky blue poplin—in a very fine quality like Sea Island cotton—with a semi-spread collar that has a high stand at the back and a wide tie space. The shirt continues the Connery Bond tradition for two-button cocktail cuffs, which have a deep but simple, streamlined shape that is rounded at the corners, but less rounded than on Connery’s cuffs from Turnbull & Asser. The cuff is cut with the same shape as Roger Moore’s one-button button-down cocktail cuffs from The Persuaders!, but the different button arrangement significantly changes its appearance.

The buttons on the front are hidden by an unusual raised fly placket with one stitching line down the centre. A fly front makes more sense when the shirt has double cuffs so no buttons are visible on the shirt, but there’s nothing wrong with this shirt’s configuration since the cocktail cuffs elevate the shirt over ordinary button cuffs. The shirt has a close fit with side darts at the rear.

Photo sourced from Thunderballs.org

Roger Moore distances himself from the previous two Bond actors by wearing a striped tie instead of a solid tie with this outfit. This is Bond’s first non-solid tie, except for the tie he borrows from Sir Hilary Bray for his disguise. This tie is a Royal Navy military tie in silk reppe from Benson & Clegg, appropriately worn here by the naval commander that James Bond is. The tie should only be worn by those who have served in the Royal Navy, but it’s not a uniform tie. It has a navy ground with a narrow red stripe atop a slightly narrower white stripe. The red and white stripes provide an effective focal point among the sea of blue. The stripes ascend from the wearer’s right hip to left shoulder, the traditional British direction for military stripes. This direction also harmonises well with the left-over-right buttoning of a man’s suit and subtly helps draw attention up toward the wearer’s face, since most people in the Western world read from left to right. The majority of James Bond’s striped ties throughout the series follow this traditional British direction. Bond ties it in a four-in-hand knot, sometimes with a dimple.

Benson & Clegg still produce this tie, and it is 3 1/2 inches wide. It’s possible that Moore’s tie is the same width, but it is difficult to tell under his jacket and it could be slightly wider.

Bond’s shoes are black tassel loafers, which have a high vamp and trendy higher Cuban heels. These shoes may be from Gucci, since he wears an identifiable pair of Gucci bit loafers later in the film with his black shirt. With the chesterfield, Bond wears black leather gloves to match his black shoes.

Now Pay Attention

DINNER SUIT
TailorCyril Castle
FabricLight navy worsted flannel
JACKET
Front buttons2, medium-low stance
LapelsMedium notch
ShoulderSoft with semi-roped sleeve heads
Breast pocketWelt
Hip pocketsStraight, flapped
Vents2
Cuff buttons2 back-to-back
TROUSERS
FrontDarted
Support‘DAKS Tops’ 3-button side-adjusters
Front/side pocketsCash pockets under the waistband
RiseHigh
LegFlared
HemPlain
SHIRT
ShirtmakerFrank Foster
FabricSky blue poplin
CollarSemi-spread
Cuff2-button cocktail
FrontPlacket fly front
TIE
BrandBenson & Clegg
FabricRoyal Navy military stripe in navy with red and white stripes
KnotFour-in-hand
SHOES
ShoemakerPossibly Gucci
StyleBlack tassel loafers
COAT
TailorCyril Castle
FabricNavy cashmere
LengthJust above the knee
Front buttons6×2
CollarNavy velvet collar, peaked lapels
Breast pocketNone
Hip pocketsStraight, flap
Cuff1 with gauntlet
Vent1
EdgesBluff

31 COMMENTS

  1. Haha! Ok, you win! 150 articles later and I'm going to have to make an amendment.

    Still sure that trilby in Doctor No is green.

    Merry Christmas, Matt.

  2. Sorry for having to correct you Chris, but I just couldn't post a link to your article without having to point that out. But you did such a good job writing about the chesterfield that if I wrote something it would only be copying you. Happy Christmas to you too!

  3. This is my most favourite James Bond suit! I can remember it as a child and thinking 'when I grow up I want that!'. Sean was the best but Rodger was the best dressed!!

  4. A Chesterfield coat is dark (either plain or in a herringbone weave/pattern), has a velvet collar and is fitted through the waist. They typically have flapped pockets. A single-breasted Chesterfield has a fly front. The Chesterfield is a formal type of overcoat, which is a more general category.

  5. A little late with a comment, I know, but I was suprised to see you refer to this as a Chesterfield coat. I would have thought this was a type of Paletot or unbelted Guards Coat.

    Are there any significant differences that mean that the terminology Chesterfield is more accurate or is it that these terms are sufficiently loose that a coat might be properly called both?

    • The original paletot has semi-body coat construction (like a frock coat in back). This could qualify as a more modern paletot. If it doesn’t have a belt it’s not a guards coat. This is a Chesterfield—albeit a short one—because it is cut like a lounge coat and has a velvet collar.

      • Thank you. A far clearer explanation of the differences than I have ever seen elsewhere.

  6. I’ve come to the conclusion that this is the most elegant and majestic of all Bond’s overcoats in all the movies. Coupled with the suit and the Royal Navy tie, the perfect sartorial introduction to Moore’s Bond.

  7. Interesting reading your comments about the UK vs. USA direction of tie stripes.

    I have read that the UK direction (starting top left side and going down to the right hip as seen by the wearer) is a military tradition signifying “front the heart to the sword”. Not sure if this is true. Anyone heard this explanation?

  8. Yes, a very nice overcoat worn by Roger Moore as James Bond! I have always been a fan of this overcoat and it is a shame that it was not seen that much in the film. Also, I like the suit that is worn underneath this overcoat. It is to bad that this suit was not seen in the film without the overcoat. I know that there are ways of seeing this suit without the overcoat but I wish it was in the film. I think it would be interesting to note that this is the only time we see Roger Moore wear a solid navy suit as James Bond. I find it to be interesting that this is the only James Bond film wear Roger Moore is wearing side adjusters instead of a belt. It is these details that make it interesting to read about James Bond’s clothes and as always how great Roger Moore was as James Bond! I would say one of the best overcoat in the series! Great article as always Mr. Spaiser!

  9. Unfortunately, clothesonfilm.com no longer exists, so the link to the article on the chesterfield coat is not available.

    Sorry if that is already known.

  10. Would you consider covering the overcoat Matt, since the link you referred to is no more ? Or maybe simply quoting Mr. Laverty’s former article entirely, in case it is available somewhere else, so we can enjoy it ?
    Also, does anyone have a link to this promotional pictures of Moore wearing the suit alone ? I would like to see this suit without the overcoat. It’s really the FRWL situation reversed, when you see the whole overcoat here but never the suit underneath ! Frustrating.

  11. It’s pretty striking how snug -yet not too tight- the fit is. In some shots I even have the probably wrong impression that he’s not wearing a suit jacket underneath. The shoulder width seem almost the same as his suit shoulders’ (assuming they are the same as the solid grey suit).
    Very classic look, still the color palette is very winter/Connery here and not sure if it’s that flattering on him. The pretty high contrast between the light shirt and dark suit may be a bit much for his complexion. But its definitely a perfect look for London or New York.

  12. Something that I’ve been trying to keep track of whilst rewatching the old classic Bond films is how many ‘War Wounds’ (scars and the sort of injuries likely to leave a scar) 007 displays in the course of his caseload: it’s not entirely pertinent to the focus of this blog, but it’s not without some relevance.

    After all, scars are distinguishing features, so a self-respecting secret agent with a number of scars might well use his clothing to conceal or downplay same.

    For the curious, my current total of confirmed scars to date includes:-

    – That scar on the lower back (Possibly near the spine) used as an identifying feature in FROM RUSSIA WITH LOVE

    – What looks like the scar of a small bullet in Bond’s left shoulder and a criss-cross scar on his upper right arm (Spotted in LICENCE TO KILL)

    – The distinctive horizontal scar between nose and right upper lip Mr Pierce Brosnan picked up in TOMORROW NEVER DIES

    (I’m also inclined to interpret the makeup job used to conceal Sir Sean’s tattoos as a war wound: possibly a chemical burn of some sort).

    It also seems highly likely that the following injuries would leave a scar:-

    – Ankle wound via gunshot (THUNDERBALL)

    – Cuts to lower right arm by knife (LIVE AND LET DIE)

    – Cut to upper right arm by enemy diving suit, lacerations on upper back after being dragged over coral (FOR YOUR EYES ONLY)

    – Contusion to head suffered during capture by Hong Kong narcotics (LICENCE TO KILL)

    – It also seems highly likely that Bond doing so much punching would have left him with the rather swollen knuckles of a prizefighter and that his having received so many knocks would have left him with a somewhat bartered face and more than one ‘invisible injury’ to his skeleton.

  13. Definitely one of my favourite Bond looks of all time. The coat is also one I’d love to have replicated for myself. It’s only a shame it appeared in one of the most racist and sexist entries of the series as well!

  14. When watching LALD as a youth, I always thought this outfit was somewhat comical in the context of the Harlem scenes, juxtaposed with Mr. Big and crew. However, after viewing all the Bond movies many times over, I find it to be one of Moore’s best. He does stand out like a sore thumb relative to the environment, but it’s an excellent choice for the character.

  15. How wide are these trousers above the knee? If they were cut straight, would they be much wider than Lazenby’s Major trousers? Or perhaps a similar width to Hayward’s in OP and AVTAK?

  16. I can’t remember – annoyingly for me as this my favourite film, favourite Bond film, and my favourite outfit from all the Bonds – is there a half-belt at the back?

    • No. The half belt feature starts with the Brioni navy double breasted overcoat in DAD, and then comes back again in QOS and Spectre with two black double breasted overcoats as well, but with different styles of lapels.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.