Bond Wardrobe Review 19: The World Is Not Enough (1999)


I Don’t Know Any Tailor Jokes

James Bond: Pierce Brosnan
Director: Michael Apted
Costume designer: Lindy Hemming
Tailoring: Brioni
Shirts: Turnbull & Asser
Ties: Turnbull & Asser and Herbie Frogg
Footwear: Church’s


Lindy Hemming returns with Brioni, Turnbull & Asser and Church’s to dress Brosnan at his most elegant for The World Is Not Enough. The same look from Brosnan’s first two Bond films returns, but it has been refined for The World Is Not Enough.

Like in From Russia with Love and Diamonds Are Forever, Bond’s own wardrobe consists almost entirely of tailored clothes: suits and a dinner jacket. It gives the film a more traditional feel. The only exception in Bond’s own wardrobe in The World Is Not Enough is a ski suit. Bond also steals a uniform for a disguise. Focusing on suits, especially suits that have a timeless style that avoid trends, gives this film a stylish wardrobe that still looks superb today.

Formal Wear

The evening wear is almost the same as in Tomorrow Never Dies, minus the waistcoat. Removing the waistcoat tremendously changes the outfit, giving it a far more modern look. There’s neither a waistcoat nor a cummerbund, both modernising the outfit and returning Bond back to his usual ways prior to Licence to Kill. The dinner suit is made of a midnight blue cloth, and it is mohair-and-wool like the GoldenEye dinner suit is, which again emphasises the modern look. The wide peaked lapels take centre stage and look perfect on Brosnan. Because there is no waistcoat, Brosnan wears the dinner jacket fastened (not that he couldn’t have fastened it with a waistcoat), and it has a more flattering effect.

The shirt repeats the formal look of a marcella bib, semi-spread collar and double cuffs, and the front fastens with studs or stud-like buttons.

The most notable part of this outfit are the X-ray glasses. The metal frames are delicate, following trends of the time, and have light blue lenses that suggest the glasses’ x-ray properties. Bond only wears them for a brief—but memorable—moment, and they only enhance his already-superb ensemble.

Lounge Suits

The Brioni suits in The World Is Not Enough continue the classic button-three style that was popular in the late 1990s, but the fullness from the previous two films has been dialled back. The suits still have a full cut by today’s standards, but it’s full in a classic way without going to extremes. Most of the suits have replaced the pleated trousers with trimmer darted trousers, but they still have turn-ups. With these suits, Hemming again did a fantastic job of looking to the past but picking out from the past what was on trend. I believe finding the overlap between classic styles and current trends is the key to looking timeless.

The first suit is one of Brosnan’s best. It’s a classic charcoal worsted, a first for Bond. The suit has straight pockets and no ticket pocket, toning down Brosnan’s usual British details. I find that the lack of slanted pockets puts the focus back on the Italian cut. The slanted pockets on most of Brosnan’s suits are enough to help us think of British style, even if they can’t turn a Brioni suit British. The jacket still has double vents, which were uncommon outside of British suits at the time, so it still has this nod towards British suits. Vent-less suits were commonly associated with Italian style at this time, though Brioni usually used double vents.

Brosnan wears the suit with a mid blue royal oxford shirt. Deeper blues were popular at the time, but this shade finds an attractive balance between the trendy French blue and the classic sky blue. This shirt debuts a new collar with a higher and wider spread. It is similar to Turnbull & Asser’s Regent collar but higher, slightly narrower and with longer points. The collar is a dramatic one with a significant presence that makes Brosnan look his best. Though the charcoal suit and blue shirt pairing is a repeat from Tomorrow Never Dies, the tie with this suit is more nuanced. It revives the blue and brown combination, but in a subtle navy and bronze zigzag pattern. I think this is the most elegant tie of Brosnan’s Bond wardrobe. It is subtle and hints at Connery’s subtle ties. The suit also has brown and blue threads in it, which the tie mirrors.

It’s the eye wear that dates this wardrobe the most. Small, delicate frames were trendy at the time. Bond wears a pair of glasses with this suit as both a semi-disguise and a gadget. The glasses seemed like a good choice at the time, but they aren’t the kind of classic style that Bond usually gravitates to. Nevertheless, they are subtle and not distracting.

The black Church’s Presley monk shoes are also a bit of their time, but I still think they look cool, especially on Bond. They suit a character who creator Ian Fleming stated ‘abhorred laces’ while being dressier than the loafers he originally preferred. Today double-monk shoes are much more popular, but I prefer Brosnan’s single monks.

His second suit not only one of Brosnan’s most unique suits, it is also one of the most unique suits of the Bond series. It’s a dark charcoal pinstripe three-piece suit (the only three-piece suit of the film), and the waistcoat recalls the famous glen check suit in Goldfinger with its notched lapels. It’s the only suit in the film that fastens with one button, which recalls a Savile Row trend that continues to this day. Of all the suits in the film, this one recalls British tailoring the most, so it’s perfect for the London setting. It reintroduces Brosnan’s usual slanted pockets with a ticket pocket, enhancing the British look. The pinstripe, however, is too subtle for traditional British style, and it gets lost when the suit is soaked. Subtle stripes like this were fashionable at the time, but it would have been nice to see Bond in one of his classic chalk stripes instead. A grey pocket square—the film’s only pocket square—helps bring out the stripes.

There’s only one real issue with this suit: Brosnan wears it with a belt. Belts and waistcoats are not friends because the belt ruins the line of the waistcoat. A belt will create a lump under a well-fitted waistcoat that fits close to the body. Side adjusters would have been better, but braces would have been best. Braces with suits aren’t in character for Bond, but they would never be visible under a waistcoat.

He wears it with a white shirt and a black tie with a bold geometric patterns in red, gold and silver. This tie does not get lost when it gets wet, and it effectively helps Bond stand out in the Q boat sequence. It’s not the most traditionally Bondian tie, but it is a beautiful pattern. A red tie may have been a better choice, however, for both visibility and to follow Bond traditions.

Bond continues the dark grey theme with the next suit, a dark grey tweed windowpane for a funeral in Scotland. The dark grey colour makes it look appropriate for a funeral, but the tweed and its windowpane pattern look appropriate in the country setting. Brosnan’s usual slanted pockets with a ticket pocket add to the country look. It’s an unusual balance to strike between relaxed country and formal funeral, but I think it works well. A dark grey flannel suit may have been an even better choice, like what Sean Connery wears for the funeral at the start of Thunderball, but I like Brosnan’s suit too. I also appreciate that it repeats the grey windowpane from GoldenEye. He wears it with a white shirt and a black knitted cashmere tie. Though the black silk knit is the classic Bond tie, it’s wonderful to see Brosnan get on board with the knitted tie, and cashmere nicely complements the tweed suit.

To dress up the suit for the funeral, Brosnan wears a charcoal double-breasted overcoat in the same style as the Tomorrow Never Dies coat. It’s on screen for only a short time, but it tremendously enhances the funeral look.

The grey pick-and-pick (also called sharkskin) suit might be considered the star suit of the film. The suit recalls the grey pick-and-pick suits that Sean Connery wears in From Russia with Love as well as his numerous other grey semi-solid and glen check suits that are often mistaken for sharkskin. Like most of Connery’s suits it has straight pockets. It’s a joy to see Brosnan dressing this way. He wears it with a white shirt and with the same navy and bronze zigzag tie that he wears at the start of the film. This wardrobe reuses items to create a strong wardrobe identity and a sense of realism.

Brosnan wears this suit twice in the film, and the second time he wears a tie from Herbie Frogg in dark blue with a small pattern of light brown ticks. Both ties have the same colours, furthering Brosnan’s blue and brown sartorial identity.

The navy birdseye suit returns again in this film to continue the Brosnan tradition. It could believably pass for the same suit that Brosnan wears in GoldenEye and Tomorrow Never Dies. It’s even more consistent than Connery’s dark grey flannel suit. He wears it with a white shirt this time, and the tie is red twill with red dots that have a white dot in the centre. It’s a different look for Brosnan, but I find the colour palette uninspired, particularly compared to how he wears his navy birdseye suit in Tomorrow Never Dies with an ecru shirt and bronze tie. It makes Bond look a bit like a politician. Bond rarely wears red ties against a white shirt because the combination looks harsh. In this outfit, however, the white shirt and red tie help our eye focus on Bond in the busy and dimly lit scene at the caviar factory.

The film’s final suit is the best of Brosnan’s three dressed-down warm-weather suits in the series. It’s an ecru Irish linen herringbone suit with patch pockets and a single vent. I find the single vent choice odd, and it doesn’t look as good as Brosnan’s usual double vents. The trousers revive the double reverse pleats from Brosnan’s first two films, and they prove necessary when Bond is strapped to a torture chair.

He wears this suit with a French blue royal oxford shirt that has Turnbull & Asser’s ‘Number 3’ point collar. This collar drapes perfectly when worn open without a tie. The shirt is also the only time Bond wears Turnbull & Asser’s classic three-button cuff. It’s perfect for this more casual suit and doesn’t look out of place when Bond finds himself underwater in this outfit, sans jacket. Light brown monk shoes perfectly complement this suit. While this film’s climax isn’t the most exciting of the Bond series, I appreciate seeing Brosnan wearing an elegant outfit during this moment.

Mission Gear

The ski suit looks fantastic on Brosnan. I am not familiar with ski wear trends, so I can’t say if this outfit looks outdated now, but I think it still looks good. Its green colour is unusual for Bond, but it helps Bond camouflage in wooded areas and stand out against the snow on screen without being as garish as Roger Moore’s yellow ski suit in The Spy Who Loved Me. The sunglasses are the weakest part of the outfit. They were on trend at the time and probably made Brosnan look cool, but I would have preferred ski goggles in this scene.

The Russian Atomic Energy Agency uniform is one of the best disguises in the series. It’s clearly a disguise, but it doesn’t compromise Bond’s coolness like some of Roger Moore’s disguises do. He’s also still dressing as James Bond—he’s wearing his white dress shirt from his dinner suit underneath the uniform. Even in disguise, Brosnan’s Bond isn’t completely giving up his style.

Other Characters

Robbie Coltrane’s Valentin Zukovsky wears some fantastic outfits in this film. They’re flashy and appropriate for a man who operates a casino. The grey mohair dinner suit and the taupe dinner jacket are both fun and creative looks.

Well Done, James

Brosnan’s established sartorial identity from the first two Bond films continues in The World Is Not Enough, but it’s been toned down to a more classically Bond look. I think it has been perfected in this film. This wardrobe’s focus on tailoring makes it a strong one. Wearing a suit is part of the character, and it thoroughly helps Pierce look the part of Bond throughout the film. There are no more tactical military outfits, so Bond always looks like a secret agent rather than a soldier.

The spread collar on Brosnan’s Turnbull & Asser shirts worn with neck ties is one of the most perfect collars. It’s higher than the average collar to give the shirt and Brosnan presence. The medium-wide spread helps give Bond a rakishly British look. Brosnan has never looked better than he does in this collar.

Not Perfected Yet

My main complaint about the wardrobe is that the suits, while hinting at British style, are not quite British enough for Bond. They’re as good as they can be without being British, particularly as some are made of British cloths. But even when they have slanted pockets they still look like Italian suits masquerading as British suits. Considering the circumstances regarding product placement, I think that the suits are as good as they possibly could be. The Turnbull & Asser shirts and ties make up for it.

I find that some of the belts in this film draw too much attention to themselves. I prefer Bond in trousers with side-adjusters, but belts aren’t wrong, and they were in fashion at this time.


Relying on tailored outfits in this film recalls Bond’s origins in a successful way. Some of the outfits recall Connery’s style, but in a pleasantly refreshed way for 1999. Lindy Hemming provided Brosnan with classic Bond looks for almost every scene. The full—but not oversized—fits are flattering on Brosnan, and like Cary Grant’s style they will stand the test of time. Most importantly, Brosnan looks the part of James Bond in every outfit.

Rating: 9/10

Do you agree or disagree with my assessment? Leave your comments below.


  1. Glad you approve of 007’s more sophisticated (in my opinion), shades look! Not sure how appropriate sunglasses are in combination with formalwear let alone in an indoors context but as a guy with miodesopsia I tend to leave ‘em on inside and of course out to help ignore the perennial floaters!

    I guess the lighter-shaded lenses makes them more acceptable as standard eyewear too.

  2. Oh, regarding the grey windowpane worn in Scotland – is a windowpane patterned suit sombre-apposite? I always assumed that a very dark grey plain suit was best for funerals if not a striped suit in grey or black (to offset the black itself which would otherwise be too sombre), but that a check was inappropriate for its relative frivolity?

    I’d wear NO tone of blue to a funeral so I guess I’d choose a grey check over a plain navy . . . Not sure if navy is regarded as safe for the occasion or not but I personally wouldn’t.

    I myself have a very nice single-toned dark
    grey herringbone-woven suit for funerals. Never had to wear it yet (thank God), but . . . can’t deny that I’m looking forward to doing so, perverse as that may seem?? [Insert ‘awkward laugh emoji’ here!]

    • Haha. Dark grey herringbone is a nice and tasteful pattern, see Connery’s suit in YOLT or Moore’s in TMWTGG. You should wear it for more joyful occasions as well, if I may express my opinion !

      • It was a middle-priced thing (¥50,000), from Japan’s (YOLT!), Aoyama and I absolutely agree that it’s fine for ALL occasions . . . It’s beautiful and I had to have it upon seeing it. It’s just that . . . upon seeing that Australian series ‘Struggle Street’ and a guy therein fretting that he had nothing to wear to his mother’s funeral I got a little obsessed with making sure that I DID have a funeral suit . . .

        You’re right though – a single-toned grey herringbone weave takes you literally ANYWHERE and it’s not even a ‘dull’ suit – it pops!

        I also have four of the same
        Aoyama mid-grey plaid things (‘cos I was richer then and one just wasn’t enough – I needed three spares!), and a few of their navy suits including a relatively expensive ¥70,000 unvented navy suit that looked great – never thought I’d condone the unvented look but it’s so rare now that it does constitute a cute novelty.

        Most expensive thing is a ¥150,000 light grey linen suit from Tamaya in Kunitachi, Tokyo (because hand-stitched and fully canvassed, no glue). Best tailor in the Orient!

      • Good for you ! Ventless jackets are my favorite. It’s not that practical when being seated or putting both hands in your trousers pockets, alright, but I love the old-fashioned, sleek, streamlined look a lot. Double vents seem way too common now. I may have a different opinion if I had a bigger seat though !

      • Almost all my jackets and suits are ventless for the exact reason you state. And unlike Daniel Craig who seems to be always posing for pictures with hands in pockets, my Mam taught me as a young boy that this was bad manners so I try to avoid doing so, thus ventless jackets don’t pose a problem in this regard.
        And lest we forget, Cary Grant’s NXNW suit and Connery’s exemplary suits in Thunderball were all ventless!

    • Exactly, also let’s not forget the famous train suit in FRWL and most suits worn by Hitchcock characters in the 50s. Some of Martin Landau’s beautiful suits in NBN were ventless as well if I remember, I guess it would be interesting to look at one of them, what do you think Matt ?

  3. I agree the suits are elegant and well chosen. I also agree the three piece is really lovely. It’s nice to hear the name Herbie Frogg mentioned. I had a couple of shirts from them about twenty years ago. They were classy but with a bit of a gangster feel (one was black as I recall). To me, 9 seems a bit high as I have to say I find the wardrobe in this film a little difficult to get excited about. Bond never really moves out of his elegant European banker cover, to my mind. It would have been nice to see some more casual outfits, blazers etc and a more interesting use of colour and pattern. I don’t think it helps that the movie itself never really moves out of third gear, with a boring villain and uninspired love interest. However, as an epee fencer, I am keen to hear your views of the fencing outfits in the next installment!

  4. Brosnan never looked better. As this was released the same year as Thomas Crown Affair, it’s interesting to see some of the divergent choices made despite similar Italian tailoring and the English shirts and ties. I like both, but Lindy really nails it here with a look that is timely and timeless.

    I would’ve given this a 10/10. Of the remaining movies, only QOS is close, and that could’ve gotten a 9/10 (I ding it for the low rise trousers, long ties, harsh palette, and… denim).

  5. Definitely Brosnan’s best film sartorially. I think Lindy Hemming’s more minimalist approach was the right one. I’ve never been a fan of Brosnan, but he comes closest to embodying the character in this film, both in performance and in appearance.

    Are Brosnan’s trousers tapered at all? They remind me a little of Connery’s in DN.

  6. The charcoal suit in the Swiss Bank opening scene is one of my favourite of the series, and as Matt has alluded to, it’s the blue shirt that anchors it. That particular shade of blue, for me, is perfection.

  7. Good wardrobe review 19. I also give a rating of 9, with one point deducted for wearing a belt with the waistcoat of a three piece suit. I find the deeper blue shirts interesting but generally prefer sky blue shirts. Matt, could you elaborate on the variations of deeper blue shirts like Cornflower blue, Saxon blue, French blue, etc.? In Skyfall, Mallory’s cotton poplin shirt is said to be deep sky blue, but it looks more like Cornflower or even Saxon blue. The deep colour helps define the character.

  8. Largely agree with your review here Matt and the general consensus that this was Brosnan’s sartorial peak as Bond. I’m a sucker for sharkskin and love the silver grey suit which harkens back to the Thunderball Junkanoo suit – the best in the entire canon for me! I also always liked the beige linen suit and royal blue shirt which is a great example of how to wear a suit casually.

  9. Ha, I sure was waiting for this one on Monday !
    What can I say… it’s nice to see that you really enjoyed the wardrobe, we can feel it while reading the article. I agree about the 9/10 -everything is flawless but I would have appreciated one suit being replaced by a more casual outfit, just for the pleasure of variety. Although some scenes definitely required a suit. The wardrobe reminds me a lot of the FRWL one, with Bond wearing mostly impeccably tailored suits. But the ski outfit looks pretty cool (it’s probably the belt giving the ensemble a cool silhouette), it’s even more stylish than Lazenby’s as far as I am concerned, and Broz is the only guy who can wear a white evening shirt with a workwear jacket, work boots and still looking extremely cool.
    I don’t really agree -surprise, surprise !- with the « not perfected yet » part- Moore wore Italian suits as well, more closely fitted obviously, but still, and I never really noticed the belts, they seemed pretty generic to me.
    Hemming did a wonderful job !
    The sharkskin suit, most people’s favorite, including me, seemed an homage to the FRWL train suit as you noticed it. Coud Hemming have slimmed the lapels just a little (8.5 or 9 cm) here as a nod ? They look a bit slimmer than the Goldeneye and TND to me.
    I don’t really care about the glasses, but one quality about them is that they allow the viewer to look at the actor’s face without being distracted by an accessory. A quality that disappeared in the last 2 Craig movies, where the sunglasses looked way too fashionable and distracted the viewer from just seeing an actor’s face and his expressions.
    Matt, how wide would you say the dinner suit peaked lapels are, please ?

  10. Seeing the wardrobes reviewed in sequence really emphasizes how much Brosnan looks (as mentioned) like a banker, in comparison to the other Bonds

  11. This film most definitely favours my theory that Mr Pierce Brosnan is the only Bond to go neck-and-neck with Sir Roger in the Sheer Elegance Stake Race (and not for lack of competition from the other fellows): the rest of the opposition can look pretty darned impeccable, but there’s always that little hint of native thuggery (Connery, Craig) or a certain inherent disinclination towards suits (Dalton) holding them back.

    It now occurs to me that Mr Lazenby might well be my pick for third in this particular race: I suspect that only that frilly shirt and the sad lack of more than one film’s worth of evidence that holds down his ranking! (-:

  12. The thing that I take from seeing all these images back to back is how absolutely perfect Pierce’s hair is. Wow! I share a lot of Irish genes with Mr. Brosnan and at times bear a passing resemblance to him (only about 95% less handsome) and I have the thick hair, but not the hairline. Mine starts just a little further up my head. Seeing someone this perfect can drive a man mad with envy if he were the type!

    • Imagine how I feel as a bisexual girl seeing all the beautiful women in these films! I can’t decide if I want to be them or be with them…

      • Hahaha! Porque no los dos? It is indeed something of a blessing and a curse for those of us without a distinct preference… Spoiled for choice.

  13. 9 would be my score too. Very timeless looking tailored clothing. I’m not a fan of monk strap shoes or any suit worn without a tie but those are just personal preferences. I think my dislike of suits worn without a tie is because they are now the go to for those who hate tailored clothing but feel they have to wear it for work, the so called ‘relaxed’ look. The suit here is casual which helps but I think an odd jacket and trousers would have been a better choice. Agree with others about Pierce Brosnan’s hair too, it looks fantastic here and in DAD.

  14. Brosnan looks great in the film, but the thing that dates it for me is the 3-botton jackets. Admittedly they look better on Brosnan than on most of us (he had an excellent build for a suit), but 3-button jacket is a hard look to pull off. Gotta have a goldilocks build – can’t be too big or too small – and most of us just don’t have that. Was glad to see the back of the 3-button jacket trend.

  15. I have always been a big fan of Mr Brosnan as James Bond, even if the stories could be uneven (Sophie Marceau as a villain was superb; Denise Richards, beautiful as she is, as a nuclear scientist not so much). His costuming in this film could be template for any modern man and there are few examples, even among the Bond actors, who wear a suit any better. He really is one of the rare men who looks as if he is more comfortable in a suit than casual clothes.

  16. The solid belt in the opening scene of the movie could potentially be divisive, although the ones in the rest of the film seem fairly neutral for me. Dunhill still sell the belt Brosnan wears with the sharkskin suit.

  17. I might get some stick for this, but I think TWINE does the best job of any Bond film made after 1965 of channeling the pre-YOLT wardrobe.

  18. My major problem with The World Is Not Enough isn’t James Bond’s attire or anything else other than Denise Richards. I can’t stand that creep.

    In the worst way, she was a distraction from everybody and everything in that movie. I’m sure James Bond’s attire was decent.

    But it’s hard to remember with the former Mrs. Charlie Sheen, Mrs. Aaron Phypers for the last five and a half years, stinking up the movie and distracting me dreadfully in every way. I would actually enjoy the movie and find it memorable, including 007’s attire, otherwise.

  19. Very interesting and precise article.
    I agree with almost everything written, the topics where I diverge are listed bellow:

    – the grey stripe suit. I don’t see any problem in wearing it with a belt. In fact, this Brosnan’s look is one of the best of the entire series.
    – the last suit is amazing, the combination with the blue shirt is outstanding. Comparing to the suit worn in GoldenEye with the white shirt, this one really stands out. I didn’t understand the belt issue in this one though. The belt in this sequence is black whereas Bond is using a brown pair of shoes. He definitely should be wearing a brown belt to match with the shoes specially because the suit is brighty and the shirt is unique and a complete “show off”. I remember when I watched in the movies for the first time and my old grandpa (rest in peace) and myself looked at each other and the subject was one and instinctively: he is wearing a wrong belt. In Die Another Day the mistake persists in the Cuba clinic scene, however, that suit and shirt were darker and the pair of shoes was brighter and in that particular case the belt matching with the shoes would be very weird, awkward or whatever you may call it.
    – I agree with the politician look in the caviar factory scene. He really looks like a politician but the tie is beautiful! As a matter of fact, Brosnan’s ties in this movie are quite boring, except for this one and the geometrical one he used with the grey stripe suit when visiting the MI6 with the best ever Bond scene in London with the Thames River as the set.

    This film is the one with great looks, but in my opinion, Tomorrow Never Dies still holds the victory.

    • Matt explained exactly why the belt doesn’t work with the striped three-piece suit: “Belts and waistcoats are not friends because the belt ruins the line of the waistcoat. A belt will create a lump under a well-fitted waistcoat that fits close to the body. Side adjusters would have been better, but braces would have been best. Braces with suits aren’t in character for Bond, but they would never be visible under a waistcoat.”

  20. What is your opinion on wearing a marcella bib shirt with mother of pearl buttons for black tie as Pierce does here? I know they look like studs but I think they are smooth front MOP buttons. Opinions on this with marcella bib rather than pleated bib? Having a midnight blue shawl lapel dinner suit made (similar to Dr. No style.)

    • Yes, I do believe they’re shanked buttons that resemble studs. I think this is appropriate. They shouldn’t be regular sew-through buttons with a marcella bib.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.